--- description: Get information about GitHub Copilot price, usability & features from verified user experiences. Read reviews from Indian business users & discover similar tools. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: GitHub Copilot Price, Features, Reviews & Ratings - Capterra India --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [AI Coding Assistants](/directory/34828/ai-coding-assistants/software) > [GitHub Copilot](/software/1051539/copilot) # GitHub Copilot Canonical: https://www.capterra.in/software/1051539/copilot Page: 1 / 3\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.in/software/1051539/copilot?page=2) > Cloud-based AI coding assistant with inline suggestions, chat, autonomous agents, code review, and pull request support across IDEs. > > Verdict: Rated **4.5/5** by 50 users. Top-rated for **Likelihood to recommend**. ----- ## Overview ### Who Uses GitHub Copilot? Individual developers, students, educators, and open source contributors. ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **Overall** | **4.5/5** | 50 Reviews | | Ease of Use | 4.7/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Customer Support Software | 3.9/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Value for Money | 4.2/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Features | 4.5/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 90% | (9/10 Likelihood to recommend) | ## About the vendor - **Company**: Microsoft - **Location**: Redmond, US - **Founded**: 1975 ## Commercial Context - **Starting Price**: $0.00 - **Pricing model**: (Free version available) - **Target Audience**: Self Employed, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1,000, 1,001–5,000, 5,001–10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Cloud, SaaS, Web-based - **Supported Languages**: English, German, Japanese, Korean, Spanish - **Available Countries**: United States ## Features - Content Generation - Data Augmentation - Natural Language Processing - Simulation and Scenario Generation ## Integrations (38 total) - AWS Auto Scaling - AWS CloudFormation - Amazon Simple Notification Service (SNS) - Amazon Simple Queue Service (SQS) - Android Studio - Azure DevOps Server - Azure Portal - Bitbucket - Chocolatey - Claude Code - Confluence - Cursor - Databricks - Eclipse - Elsevier Pure ... and 23 more integrations ## Support Options - Email/Help Desk - FAQs/Forum - Knowledge Base Software - Phone Support - 24/7 (Live rep) ## Category - [AI Coding Assistants](https://www.capterra.in/directory/34828/ai-coding-assistants/software) ## Related Categories - [AI Coding Assistants](https://www.capterra.in/directory/34828/ai-coding-assistants/software) - [AI Code Generator Software](https://www.capterra.in/directory/34377/ai-code-generator/software) - [Generative AI Tools](https://www.capterra.in/directory/34155/generative-ai/software) ## Alternatives 1. [Blaze](https://www.capterra.in/software/1056061/blaze) — 4.8/5 (725 reviews) 2. [ChatGPT](https://www.capterra.in/software/1049484/chatgpt) — 4.4/5 (396 reviews) 3. [1min.AI](https://www.capterra.in/software/1065472/1min-ai) — 4.7/5 (492 reviews) 4. [Replit](https://www.capterra.in/software/1051536/replit) — 4.4/5 (159 reviews) 5. [NightCafe](https://www.capterra.in/software/1032973/nightcafe) — 4.7/5 (85 reviews) ## Reviews ### "My detailed review on using GitHub Copilot" — 5.0/5 > **PRIYA** | *7 August 2026* | Information Technology & Services | Recommendation rating: 7.0/10 > > **Pros**: I liked most about GitHub Copilot is that it provides value for money. Has good customer support along with ease of use. Code generation, Video Creation \& Image Generation is better with GitHub Copilot as it has all the required features. Productivity is nice due to GitHub Copilot. > > **Cons**: While GitHub Copilot is powerful, it has limitations. The generated code may not always be accurate or secure, requiring developers to review and adapt it to their standards \& I personally dislike it. > > I can create powerful, task-specific agents in GitHub Copilot to automate coding workflows, collaborate on features, and orchestrate multi-step tasks directly in Visual Studio Code. This is the best feature, so overall I think it's good to go with GitHub Copilot. ----- ### "Helpful Coding Assistant" — 4.0/5 > **Osama** | *21 January 2026* | Government Administration | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: It is very helpful for writing code and reduce the chance of repetition of code. It gives useful suggestions and helps with syntax. Good for learning new programming patterns > > **Cons**: Sometimes code suggestions do not match exact requirement. Subscription cost feels high for beginners. > > Overall experience is positive. It improves productivity and helps to speed up tasks. It is a useful assistant, especially for programmers. ----- ### "Pricing changes ruin a good product" — 2.0/5 > **Damien** | *7 July 2026* | Computer Software | Recommendation rating: 3.0/10 > > **Pros**: GitHub Copilot used to be an incredible value for code assistance. For the most part, it still excels at code assistance. They have lots of models to choose from, which is nice for productivity. > > **Cons**: Pricing. The pricing changed significantly. From a flat fee to usage-based. The new pricing is nowhere near what it used to be. Its value for what it provides doesn't rival the competition. I have sadly switched to another product due to this issue. > > Good performance, horrible pricing. Very disappointed about the change in pricing. It's no longer even close to affordable. ----- ### "Good tool for coding" — 4.0/5 > **Samuel** | *12 July 2026* | Design | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: I like you get a generous free usage every month and their payment plans aren't bad prices. I mainly use it for coding in vs code which does wonders for analyzing my code base. Customer service is pretty fast at responding when having issues. I can't really tell you on image or video generation cause I never tried it for them. Great tool for productivity if your working with one of their paid plans but for free plan its only good for it if your doing short jobs. > > **Cons**: What I don't like how they changed their interface in vs code was use to the older one. But as I mention I don't use it for video generation or image generation just maily for code. > > Overall experience is ok but I have used better. Just wish they would have kept the older interface because I was use to it but learned the new interface pretty easy. I would definately recommend it to other coders due to it's great at correcting, analyzing, writing code. ----- ### "A Powerful AI Assistant That Speeds Up Everyday Development" — 4.0/5 > **Verified Reviewer** | *21 April 2026* | Information Technology & Services | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: What I like most about GitHub Copilot is how much it speeds up coding, especially for repetitive or boilerplate tasks. The code generation is where it really stands out—it can suggest full lines or even entire functions based on a simple comment, which saves a lot of time during development. In terms of ease of use, it’s very straightforward. It works directly inside the IDE, so you don’t have to switch tools or change your workflow. Most of the time it just feels like an advanced autocomplete that understands what you’re trying to do. From a value-for-money perspective, it’s quite good if you code regularly. Even small productivity gains add up quickly, and for developers working daily, it can easily justify the cost. Customization is another strong point. You can tailor its behavior using custom instructions or prompts to better match your coding style, team standards, or project requirements. This makes it more useful over time as it adapts to how you work. Customer support is decent, and there’s a lot of documentation and community content available. In practice, most issues can be resolved through docs or forums rather than direct support. While GitHub Copilot is mainly focused on code generation, it also helps with things like explaining code, writing tests, and generating documentation, which adds to its overall usefulness. However, features like video creation or image generation are not really its focus. Overall, it significantly improves productivity and reduces the time spent on routine coding tasks, making it a valuable tool for everyday development. > > **Cons**: One of the main downsides of GitHub Copilot is that it’s not always accurate, especially when working with more complex logic. It can sometimes suggest code that looks correct at first but needs careful review because it may contain small mistakes or assumptions that don’t fully match the context. Another issue is that it doesn’t always understand the full structure of larger codebases. In bigger projects, the suggestions can feel a bit disconnected or not fully aligned with existing architecture, which means you still need to manually adjust a lot of the output. Performance can also vary. Sometimes suggestions come instantly and are very helpful, but other times it feels less responsive or less relevant, which interrupts the flow a bit. There are also some limitations with deeper understanding of business logic or project-specific rules, so it works best as an assistant rather than something you can fully rely on. Overall, it’s useful, but it still requires a lot of developer oversight to make sure everything is correct and production-ready. > > Overall, my experience with GitHub Copilot has been very positive. It’s become a useful daily tool for speeding up development work and reducing the amount of repetitive coding I need to do. The biggest strength is definitely code generation. It helps with boilerplate code, function suggestions, and even test cases, which saves a lot of time during development. Over time, it feels like it learns the context of what you’re working on and becomes more helpful. In terms of ease of use, it’s very simple to get started. It integrates directly into the IDE, so there’s no need to change your workflow or switch between tools. It just works in the background and suggests code as you type. From a value for money perspective, it’s quite good if you code regularly. The time saved on repetitive tasks and faster development speed makes it worth the cost in most cases. Customization is also useful to some extent—you can guide its behavior with prompts or instructions, which helps it better match your coding style or project needs. Customer support is okay, but most issues are usually resolved through documentation or community discussions rather than direct support. One limitation is that it’s not always perfect with complex logic or large codebases, so you still need to carefully review and adjust the generated code. It’s best seen as an assistant rather than a replacement for actual development thinking. Features like video creation or image generation are not part of Copilot’s scope, so it’s purely focused on code-related tasks. Overall, it significantly improves productivity and makes development faster and more efficient, especially for everyday coding tasks and repetitive work. ----- Page: 1 / 3\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.in/software/1051539/copilot?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.in/software/1051539/copilot) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | ----- ## Structured Data