--- description: Get information about Rainforest QA price, usability & features from verified user experiences. Read reviews from Indian business users & discover similar tools. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Rainforest QA Price, Features, Reviews & Ratings - Capterra India --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Automated Testing Software](/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) > [Rainforest QA](/software/1004370/rainforest) # Rainforest QA Canonical: https://www.capterra.in/software/1004370/rainforest Page: 1 / 2\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.in/software/1004370/rainforest?page=2) > Cloud-based, no-code web app testing tool that helps teams build, run, and maintain automated tests in plain English with AI-assisted. > > Verdict: Rated **4.9/5** by 17 users. Top-rated for **Likelihood to recommend**. ----- ## Overview ### Who Uses Rainforest QA? SaaS companies ranging from early-stage startups to scale-ups, across industries including fintech, healthcare technology, security software, and business management software. ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **Overall** | **4.9/5** | 17 Reviews | | Ease of Use | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Customer Support Software | 4.9/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Value for Money | 4.8/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Features | 4.4/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 100% | (10/10 Likelihood to recommend) | ## About the vendor - **Company**: Rainforest - **Founded**: 2012 ## Commercial Context - **Starting Price**: $18,000.00 - **Pricing model**: Usage Based (Free version available) (Free Trial) - **Target Audience**: 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1,000, 1,001–5,000, 1,001–5,000, 1,001–5,000, 5,001–10,000, 5,001–10,000, 5,001–10,000, 10,000+, 10,000+, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Cloud, SaaS, Web-based - **Supported Languages**: English - **Available Countries**: Anguilla, Antigua & Barbuda, Aruba, Australia, Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, Bermuda, British Virgin Islands, Canada, Cayman Islands, Costa Rica, Cuba, Curaçao, Dominica, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Grenada, Guadeloupe, Guatemala and 19 more ## Integrations (1 total) - GitLab ## Support Options - Email/Help Desk - FAQs/Forum - Knowledge Base Software - Chat ## Category - [Automated Testing Software](https://www.capterra.in/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) ## Related Categories - [Automated Testing Software](https://www.capterra.in/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) - [Generative AI Tools](https://www.capterra.in/directory/34155/generative-ai/software) ## Alternatives 1. [Mailosaur](https://www.capterra.in/software/201911/mailosaur) — 4.8/5 (20 reviews) 2. [Diffy](https://www.capterra.in/software/216055/diffy) — 4.8/5 (5 reviews) 3. [TestCafe](https://www.capterra.in/software/156970/testcafe) — 4.5/5 (2 reviews) 4. [Browserling](https://www.capterra.in/software/147028/browserling) — 3.0/5 (5 reviews) ## Reviews ### "Easiest Automation Tool" — 5.0/5 > **Gio** | *5 March 2025* | Sports | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: Super easy to use and lots of new feature releases to make automation easier > > **Cons**: Can't think of anything negative as of the moment. > > over all a super easy to use automation tool ----- ### "RainforestQA has excelled our testing and quality." — 5.0/5 > **Chuck** | *29 December 2017* | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: RainforestQA has allowed us to automate testing of features that are not able to be tested . We also been able to start linking JIRA tickets to their RainforestQA tests which allows continuity between testing and dev tickets. > > **Cons**: The site lacks reporting features that would allow us to better track our tests and coverage, but the Rainforest team helps provide these reports when we request them. ----- ### "I can describe Rainforest QA as an easy way to run a large number of manual tests." — 5.0/5 > **Salman** | *30 December 2017* | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Pros**: Easy and straightforward to write manual tests. No setup for multiple platforms and browsers. Acceptable integration with CI systems. > > **Cons**: The UI can be improved to better organize tests. Writing tests could be easier by sharing screenshots between tests. ----- ### "Easier to write and maintain than automated UI tests" — 5.0/5 > **Verified Reviewer** | *7 June 2018* | Financial Services Software | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: It is easy to write set up the tests, to run them, and to edit them as needed. No special knowledge or skill is needed for any of this. The customer support is phenomenal, because you can always chat the Rainforest team and they get back to you right away. Also it is easy to schedule runs, and they have really improved the visibility of results, as in, you can see exactly what happened when a tester went through the test including a screen shot, the directions given, and then notes from the tester about anything their description of any problem observed. Multiple (usually 3+) testers are assigned to a test per browser when you "run" a test. > > **Cons**: False positives and false negatives are common. Mostly this is not a big deal, because they have multiple testers run through the same test in the same browser, so if one tester misunderstands the directions or makes some error, the Rainforest algorithm will automatically ignore that tester's bug report, so that you don't get a false negative for the overall run. But sometimes multiple testers will make multiple, different mistakes during a run, resulting in a false negative (i.e., a report of a run failure), even though the software actually worked fine. Oftentimes if a step is proving confusing to testers, you can easily re-word the test step to make it work out better. We actually set up 50 users on our test systems, because when you run a few tests using a few different browsers, you want them all to use unique user logins so that their work doesn't conflict. You also have to think about how to design the tests such that multiple users can create and find objects within your web app such that their simultaneous usage does not cause conflicts. Since the testers are real people using a real web app, you cannot run too many test configurations at the same time, otherwise you will get dozens of people hitting the (test) server simultaneously -- and who wants to pay for enough test servers of high bandwidth in order to handle high loads of traffic, when all you really want to test for these sorts of tests is application functionality and logic? > > Rainforest provides end-to-end testing without the high cost of dedicated QA resources, and without the high cost of writing and maintaining automated UI tests. ----- ### "Makes a QA team extremely Capable" — 5.0/5 > **Verified Reviewer** | *14 December 2018* | Veterinary Software | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: This tool allows a team to test across multiple platforms and evniroments in a way that would not be capable without a massive team. Extremely easy for someone without a coding background to pick up. > > **Cons**: Can't say about thing about this software, makes my team extremely more capable. > > This tool makes a team of 2 QA employees, a team of a million testers. Its incredible. ----- Page: 1 / 2\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.in/software/1004370/rainforest?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.in/software/1004370/rainforest) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | ----- ## Structured Data