--- description: Get information about CodeSession price, usability & features from verified user experiences. Read reviews from Indian business users & discover similar tools. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: CodeSession Price, Features, Reviews & Ratings - Capterra India --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Pre-employment Testing Software](/directory/30863/pre-employment-testing/software) > [CodeSession](/software/1100353/CodeSession) # CodeSession Canonical: https://www.capterra.in/software/1100353/CodeSession > Run live coding interviews the way real work happens: collaboratively. Create a free forever plan and start interviewing in 15 minutes. > > Verdict: Rated **4.8/5** by 5 users. Top-rated for **Likelihood to recommend**. ----- ## Overview ### Who Uses CodeSession? Engineering hiring teams at startups to enterprises who want to assess real problem-solving skills, not memorized algorithms, through collaborative live coding interviews. ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **Overall** | **4.8/5** | 5 Reviews | | Ease of Use | 5.0/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Customer Support Software | 4.8/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Value for Money | 4.8/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Features | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 90% | (9/10 Likelihood to recommend) | ## About the vendor - **Company**: CodeSession ## Commercial Context - **Starting Price**: $0.00 - **Pricing model**: Flat Rate (Free version available) - **Pricing Details**: What is CodeSession's pricing structure? CodeSession offers an inherently flexible, consumption-friendly pricing architecture designed to adapt seamlessly to the cyclical nature of technical recruiting. To eliminate the "unused seat tax" enforced by legacy assessment tools, CodeSession provides unlimited interviewer and recruiter accounts across all options. Hiring teams can select the path that best matches their current operational workflow: a Free Forever tier, predictable Monthly Subscription Tiers with low-cost overages, or 100% Subscription-Free Pay-As-You-Go Packs. What features are included on the Free Forever tier? CodeSession believes that technical validation should be accessible to teams at any growth stage. Our 100% free plan includes: - 2 live technical interviews per month - Unlimited user and interviewer accounts - Centralized Single Sign-On (SSO) configuration - Live browser-based coding interviews and vector whiteboarding - Take-home screening assessments - Customizable code templates What are CodeSession's Monthly Subscription Tiers? For teams maintaining a steady, predictable monthly pipeline, CodeSession provides three distinct subscription tiers. All paid tiers include advanced capabilities like custom whiteboard templates. If a team experiences a sudden hiring spike, they do not need to upgrade their entire subscription; they can simply purchase small top-off packs priced at $25 for 5 extra sessions ($5 per interview). Starter Plan: $59 per month - 15 technical interviews included per month - Unlimited user accounts \& Single Sign-On (SSO) - Budget-friendly overages ($25 per 5 extra sessions) - Ideal for early-stage companies and specialized teams Growth Plan: $149 per month - 40 technical interviews included per month - Unlimited user accounts \& Single Sign-On (SSO) - Budget-friendly overages ($25 per 5 extra sessions) - Built for scaling mid-market enterprises Scale Plan: $349 per month - 100 technical interviews included per month - Unlimited user accounts \& Single Sign-On (SSO) - Budget-friendly overages ($25 per 5 extra sessions) - Perfect for rapidly expanding engineering departments Enterprise Plan: $899 per month - Unlimited technical interviews per month - Unlimited user accounts \& Single Sign-On (SSO) - Best for high-volume recruitment loops and global corporate structures What are the Subscription-Free Pay-As-You-Go Packs? For organization leaders, startup founders, or agencies whose hiring schedules are completely episodic, CodeSession offers an entirely contract-free, subscription-free alternative. Teams can remain on the Free Forever tier and buy independent, flat-rate interview credit bundles that remain active over a 12-month window: - Hiring Sprint Pack: $99 one-time purchase (Includes 20 interviews over 12 months) - Recruiting Team Pack: $249 one-time purchase (Includes 60 interviews over 12 months) - Enterprise Pack: $499 one-time purchase (Includes 150 interviews over 12 months) Are there any hidden seat licenses or deployment costs? No. CodeSession does not charge per individual recruiter, seat, or coordinator account. Every paid configuration includes a 15-minute operational onboarding time, single-browser functionality (requiring zero software downloads for candidates), and instant access to over 40 programming and scripting language runtimes. - **Target Audience**: 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1,000, 1,001–5,000, 5,001–10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Cloud, SaaS, Web-based - **Supported Languages**: English - **Available Countries**: Australia, Canada, France, Germany, India, Ireland, Netherlands, Singapore, United Kingdom, United States ## Features - Candidate Management - Customizable Tests - Online Tests - Tests/Assessments ## Integrations (3 total) - Miro - Okta - Single Sign-On ## Support Options - Email/Help Desk ## Category - [Pre-employment Testing Software](https://www.capterra.in/directory/30863/pre-employment-testing/software) ## Alternatives 1. [isolved](https://www.capterra.in/software/164417/isolved) — 3.9/5 (652 reviews) 2. [TestGorilla](https://www.capterra.in/software/203823/testgorilla) — 4.1/5 (266 reviews) 3. [Criteria](https://www.capterra.in/software/119740/criteria) — 4.7/5 (196 reviews) 4. [eSkill](https://www.capterra.in/software/145759/eskill) — 4.5/5 (171 reviews) 5. [Wonderlic Select](https://www.capterra.in/software/145757/wonscore-from-wonderlic) — 4.5/5 (166 reviews) ## Reviews ### "Learn what it's really like to work with a candidate" — 5.0/5 > **Ham** | *22 June 2026* | Internet | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Pros**: CodeSession provides a no-frills interview experience that allows candidates and interviewers to focus on the stuff that matters: The code, the conversation, and the bigger ideas. Let's face it. Hiring software engineers is trickier than ever and getting enough signal from an interview process can be next to impossible. With the rise of AI I find it even harder to cut through the noise. I found that live coding sessions with CodeSession give me the best signal while being mindful of the candidate's time (and my own\!). I've experimented with take-home questions but found them hard to design well and evaluate reliably (CodeSession offers take-home questions those, too, if that's your jam). With live coding sessions I can experience what it feels like to work with a candidate face-to-face. I can see how they think, how they articulate their thoughts, how they shape their code, how they ask questions. Using CodeSession doesn't need a ton of explanation. It's simple to get started, both for me and the candidate. We can dive right into the interview without a lot of ceremony. I pick a template, invite the candidate, they click the link, and we're ready to roll. We can jam on code together, hop over into a whiteboard, it's all right there. I like that CodeSession doesn't try to be a little bit of everything. It doesn't try to embed video conferencing, chat features, or reinvent digital whiteboards. I can simply get those things elsewhere (or CodeSession conveniently embeds them as with those Miro whiteboards). It's just a fine tool that does it's job, nothing more, nothing less. Also the pricing is super fair. With the latest update I can now select between a subscription or usage-based pricing (they call it "session packs" I think?). > > **Cons**: Please let me upload a user avatar. It would make things just 5% more fun and personal and I don't want to keep looking at that corporate-gray placeholder avatar. > > I used CodeSession extensively when interviewing software engineers at Stack Overflow and have used it (or processes heavily inspired by CodeSession, but executed more poorly) in a few places after. ----- ### "A must have for straightforward code interviews for hiring software developers." — 5.0/5 > **Kyle** | *22 June 2026* | Computer Software | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: Easy to setup and use sessions as an interviewer. Keeps the interviewee focused on writing code without worrying about squiggles and build errors. I want to learn what \*they\* think - not what an IDE or parser thinks about code. I've had other interviewers use Google Docs to write code and it's very hard/distracting when proper tabbing or syntax highlighting don't work how you'd expect. > > **Cons**: There's not a lot to grip about here. The product is pretty simple, and intentionally so. I've never heard a complaint from an interviewee. Some folks want stuff like autocomplete out of an IDE, but it's more diagnostically helpful to see what code potential teammates actually write and how they reason about what they're writing. > > I've conducted about 50 interviews with engineers, for both algorithm and architecture all on CodeSession and would rate it highly. ----- ### "A solid pairing tool that nails the basics" — 4.0/5 > **Chris** | *22 June 2026* | Information Technology & Services | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Pros**: The real-time collaborative editor is genuinely excellent. I run remote technical interviews a few times a week, and the latency is so low it feels like the candidate and I are sitting at the same keyboard. Syntax highlighting works across every language I've thrown at it, and being able to spin up a shareable session in two clicks has saved me an enormous amount of friction. It's great for the core job of "two people editing the same code at the same time". > > **Cons**: The mobile experience could use some polish; it's clearly built desktop-first, which is fine for me but a little awkward when a candidate joins from their phone. I'd also love more IDE-style smarts like jump-to-definition and richer autocomplete, which I lean on heavily in my day-to-day editor. None of these are dealbreakers, though. > > CodeSession.io has become a core part of my interviewing workflow, and for the price it delivers a lot of value. The core part of the product offering (collaborative coding) is executed extraordinarily well. The rough edges (mobile support and the in-browser editor are limiting) aren't deal breakers, and the fact that the site is clearly well maintained is a big plus. Suggestion: look into a VS Code extension. It'd be cool to run it through a full editor instead of in the browser. ----- ### "An easy to use way to perform better tech interviews" — 5.0/5 > **Gervasio** | *22 June 2026* | Computer Software | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: It solidly deliver on its promise: an easy to use tool to better perform technical interviews. It stays out of the way. > > **Cons**: Some candidates expected to be able to run their code, so we started telling them about the tool before sharing the link. I suppose a better candidate onboarding when they click the link? > > Super positive, it's one of these tools that earn the place in your workflow and become transparent. ----- ### "Better collaboration with less friction" — 5.0/5 > **Meredith** | *24 June 2026* | Computer Software | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Pros**: It's easy to share with interviewees and for them to quickly jump into the interview itself. Little to no time is needed to explain CodeSession. Creating templates also allows me to focus on certain objectives or skills while also giving context for the interviewee through the code itself. This allows me to be more consistent in evaluating candidates because there's less variability in how questions are framed and communicated. > > **Cons**: At times, I wished for more IDE features but I haven't experienced this being more than an inconvenience. > > Prior to CodeSession, we unfortunately used a shared document or screenshared the candidate's text editor. This is such a solid improvement over those workflows. Not only does it improve the technical interview itself, but it allows collaboration in a way that is a preview for the culture in an organization for all participants. ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.in/software/1100353/CodeSession) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | ----- ## Structured Data