--- description: Get information about EasyPQQ price, usability & features from verified user experiences. Read reviews from Indian business users & discover similar tools. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: EasyPQQ Price, Features, Reviews & Ratings - Capterra India --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Proposal Management Software](/directory/10032/proposal-management/software) > [EasyPQQ](/software/132509/easypqq) # EasyPQQ Canonical: https://www.capterra.in/software/132509/easypqq Page: 1 / 3\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.in/software/132509/easypqq?page=2) > Bid proposal and tender management software designed to save time, improve quality and help you win more work. > > Verdict: Rated **4.4/5** by 32 users. Top-rated for **Likelihood to recommend**. ----- ## Overview ### Who Uses EasyPQQ? Any sector that is required to engage in any type of proposal or tender, including: Construction; Healthcare; Recruitment; Security; Financial Services; Legal; Consultancies. ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **Overall** | **4.4/5** | 32 Reviews | | Ease of Use | 4.3/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Customer Support Software | 4.8/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Value for Money | 4.3/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Features | 4.2/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 90% | (9/10 Likelihood to recommend) | ## About the vendor - **Company**: Propeller Studios - **Location**: Hitchin, UK - **Founded**: 2001 ## Commercial Context - **Starting Price**: $7,695.00 - **Pricing Details**: Contact EasyPQQ for pricing information. - **Target Audience**: 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1,000, 1,001–5,000, 5,001–10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Cloud, SaaS, Web-based, Android (Mobile) - **Supported Languages**: English - **Available Countries**: United Kingdom, United States ## Features - Access Controls/Permissions - Audit Trail - Collaboration Tools - Content Library - Document Management Software - Knowledge Base Management - RFP Management - Search/Filter - Templates - Version Control - Workflow Management Software ## Support Options - Email/Help Desk - Phone Support ## Category - [Proposal Management Software](https://www.capterra.in/directory/10032/proposal-management/software) ## Related Categories - [Proposal Management Software](https://www.capterra.in/directory/10032/proposal-management/software) - [Document Management Software](https://www.capterra.in/directory/30063/document-management/software) ## Alternatives 1. [AutoCAD](https://www.capterra.in/software/174021/autocad) — 4.7/5 (3205 reviews) 2. [Contractor Foreman](https://www.capterra.in/software/166113/contractor-foreman) — 4.5/5 (815 reviews) 3. [FOUNDATION](https://www.capterra.in/software/2032/foundation) — 4.3/5 (362 reviews) 4. [Revit](https://www.capterra.in/software/183122/revit) — 4.6/5 (479 reviews) 5. [Jobber](https://www.capterra.in/software/127994/jobber) — 4.6/5 (1420 reviews) ## Reviews ### "Generally an easy and convenient way of writing tenders let down by several annoying bugs." — 3.0/5 > **Patrick** | *12 May 2017* | E-Learning | Recommendation rating: 7.0/10 > > **Pros**: - Clear layout - Easy to use - Can customise the main menu - Great way to store stock answers/general company information - Visual reporting feature - Having multiple users makes it easy to divide up bid work between staff - Branding documents is easy - Search All feature saves vast amounts of time when searching for information - Collateral feature is really useful for storing key documents - Support service always very quick to sort out any reported issues > > **Cons**: - Text editor can be very buggy - have lost entire answers before - Exporting - often moves bullets points when exporting to word and tables often have to be redrawn on word because of how they appear on the page - Sometimes won't allow use to copy and paste images in to the text box - When copying and pasting text we're able to format the text (e.g. not make it bold) - Search All feature doesn't search similar phrases - need to search word for word > > It has made bid writing much more efficient as well as acting as great of storing bid information. It has also been a really useful way of tracking bids - particular with the visual reporting on the dashboard. The ability to have all bids and bidding information in one place has been the greatest benefit to us. ----- ### "Great submissions tool which saves us time and resources" — 4.0/5 > **Trudy** | *8 May 2017* | Construction software | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Pros**: We can put together any professional document in house (not just tenders and PQQ's,) which for a small company like ours saves us a lot of money in external graphics companies. We can also search all our previous answers, which enables us to fill in most questionnaires quickly, saving resources. Because of the way it is set up, it enables us to pull together the main elements of a bid using an administrator, which for us is a much better use of resource-giving our directors and managers a head start from which to work. Since implementing the system our documents are much more professional, and we are more successful with our bids. > > **Cons**: Like any software, you only get out what you put in, so keeping things up to date is essential. But this is true of any system. Sometimes things that you think would be intuitive aren't, but they are really good at listening to suggestions regarding improvements and bringing these into the system, and implementing new features to keep the system up to date. > > Increased win rations on PQQ's and Bids, reductions in marketing budget going externally to graphics companies, and increased speed in responding to enquiries. ----- ### "A user friendly piece of software built by bid managers for bid managers." — 5.0/5 > **Laura** | *9 May 2017* | Construction software | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: The process of importing the original bid document and using this to create the structure for the response is a great time saver and reduces the frequency of errors that might otherwise occur (for example, if you were keying in each question). I'm looking forward to using the Word text editor for formatting responses. This additional functionality will make document creation and formatting much easier. The project management tool provides an excellent dashboard for checking progress and allocating questions to casual users is a real bonus. It allows people to contribute their responses without requiring a log-in and full access to the system, and can be accessed from a link in an email. Really user-friendly and quick. Having a one-stop shop for the bid process from the very beginning to the final creation of the document and everything in between undoubtedly creates efficiency, which is vital to the all too often time-starved bidding programme. Access to all previous answers, which can be ranked according to previous scores, saves time and results in a higher quality library of answers. > > **Cons**: I find the cover pages and separator pages a little tricky to navigate and change when updating the style on a document. I haven't spent a great deal of time on this element of the document creation process, so it could come down to practice makes perfect\! The contents page is rather inflexible. It would be great if you could either edit the table of contents itself, or highlight words in the question to include (rather than including the whole question, which can be too lengthy). > > Very easy to use once you're up and running, and really well supported by the team at Propeller. ----- ### "The system is good value for money" — 4.0/5 > **Gill** | *17 May 2017* | Civil Engineering | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Pros**: 1. The system is easy to use we have lots of staff as designated users for a wide range of applications 2. It does everything that we need it to do 3. Easy PQQ is an effective tool to help the business develop and track leads and business relationships 4. The response from the Propeller support team is always quick and efficient and we are pleased to note that some of our system improvement suggestions have been introduced > > **Cons**: there is an element of rigidity in the reporting - so in order to set up a contact, a specific job title must be entered - which might be a one off and then unless you recall that specific title the name would not come up in reporting. An element of human thought process is required. > > Customer relationship management is much more efficient than the previous system we worked with ----- ### "Company output at the beginning but also at the end of the construction process - very impressive" — 5.0/5 > **Nick** | *8 May 2017* | Construction software | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: The impression that the output provides to the end client is very professional and the system itself is easy to use. I use the system to provide manuals to clients at the end of a construction project and this in l ine with the pre construction documentation is great as it shows a consistency of documentation which we are in control of. I like the way that the outputs can be adapted to suit any client requirements in documentation. All in all the system in my opinion is excellent. > > **Cons**: I think the updates that are always ongoing are key to making this even more user friendly, I like the fact that prior to your word editor update we were slightly restricted as to what we could do with the software, For me when creating documents as PDFs I would like to see it where the header page can incorporate the pdf within it rather than having a blank page but I guess this is something that is just the way it is. > > Consistency in documentation throughout the construction process which is great in the eyes of the end client so this has been a massive positive for me. ----- Page: 1 / 3\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.in/software/132509/easypqq?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.in/software/132509/easypqq) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Structured Data