--- description: Get information about N-central price, usability & features from verified user experiences. Read reviews from Indian business users & discover similar tools. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: N-central Price, Features, Reviews & Ratings - Capterra India --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [IT Asset Management Software](/directory/30077/it-asset-management/software) > [N-central](/software/13803/n-central) # N-central Canonical: https://www.capterra.in/software/13803/n-central Page: 1 / 11\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.in/software/13803/n-central?page=2) > N-central is a remote monitoring and management platform that helps MSPs and IT teams manage, automate, and secure IT infrastructure. > > Verdict: Rated **4.2/5** by 253 users. Top-rated for **Likelihood to recommend**. ----- ## Overview ### Who Uses N-central? The software is designed for growing and scaling Manage Service Providers (MSPs)​. Medium to large businesses ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **Overall** | **4.2/5** | 253 Reviews | | Ease of Use | 4.0/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Customer Support Software | 3.9/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Value for Money | 3.9/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Features | 4.2/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 70% | (7/10 Likelihood to recommend) | ## About the vendor - **Company**: N-able ## Commercial Context - **Starting Price**: $1.75 - **Pricing model**: Other (Free Trial) - **Pricing Details**: Free trial available, no credit card required. Contact N-able for full pricing information. - **Target Audience**: 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1,000, 1,001–5,000, 5,001–10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Cloud, SaaS, Web-based, Mac (Desktop), Windows (Desktop), Linux (Desktop), Windows (On-Premise), Linux (On-Premise), Android (Mobile), iPhone (Mobile), iPad (Mobile) - **Supported Languages**: English - **Available Countries**: Afghanistan, Algeria, American Samoa, Andorra, Angola, Anguilla, Antigua & Barbuda, Argentina, Armenia, Aruba, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Bahamas, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belgium, Benin, Bermuda and 177 more ## Features - Access Controls/Permissions - Activity Dashboard - Activity Tracking - Alerts/Escalation - Alerts/Notifications - App Management - Asset Tracking Software - Audit Management - Automatic Patch Deployment - Automatic Scans - BYOD Management - Backup and Recovery - Capacity Management - Change Management Software - Compliance Management - Compliance Tracking - Configuration Management - Contract/License Management - Cost Tracking - Dashboard Software - Deployment Management - Device Management - Event Logs - For MSPs - IT Asset Management Software - IT Asset Tracking - IT Reporting - Issue Management - Maintenance Scheduling - Monitoring - Network Monitoring Software - Network Wide Management - Patch Management Software - Performance Monitoring - Real-Time Data - Real-Time Monitoring - Real-Time Notifications - Remediation Management - Remote Access & Monitoring - Remote Access/Control - Remote Monitoring & Management - Remote Update/Installation - Reporting & Statistics - Reporting/Analytics - Scheduling Software - Self Service Portal - Supplier Management - Support Ticket Management - Task Management Software - Vulnerability Scanning ... and 18 more features ## Integrations (36 total) - 1Password - Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud - Actifile - AlertOps - Automox - Autotask PSA - Auvik - Barracuda Intronis Backup - BrightGauge - Cisco Meraki - CloudBlue - Computicate PSA - ConnectWise PSA - DNSFilter - DeskDay ... and 21 more integrations ## Support Options - Email/Help Desk - FAQs/Forum - Knowledge Base Software - Phone Support ## Category - [IT Asset Management Software](https://www.capterra.in/directory/30077/it-asset-management/software) ## Related Categories - [IT Asset Management Software](https://www.capterra.in/directory/30077/it-asset-management/software) - [Network Management Software](https://www.capterra.in/directory/30018/network-management/software) - [Endpoint Protection Software](https://www.capterra.in/directory/30907/endpoint-protection/software) - [Server Monitoring Software](https://www.capterra.in/directory/32713/server-monitoring/software) - [IT Management Software](https://www.capterra.in/directory/10001/it-management/software) ## Alternatives 1. [N-sight RMM](https://www.capterra.in/software/163344/n-sight) — 4.3/5 (202 reviews) 2. [Syncro](https://www.capterra.in/software/207618/syncro) — 4.6/5 (149 reviews) 3. [IT Glue](https://www.capterra.in/software/170401/itglue) — 4.6/5 (342 reviews) 4. [ManageEngine OpManager MSP](https://www.capterra.in/software/212602/manageengine-opmanager-msp) — 4.4/5 (75 reviews) 5. [SuperOps](https://www.capterra.in/software/1017782/superopsai) — 4.6/5 (65 reviews) ## Reviews ### "Good and Reliable Tool" — 4.0/5 > **Rupesh** | *29 April 2026* | Information Technology & Services | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Pros**: What I like most about N-central is how everything is available in one place. It makes monitoring multiple devices and servers much easier without switching between tools. The automation features, especially patching and scripting, save a lot of time in day-to-day tasks. Alerts are quite helpful as well they usually catch issues early before they become bigger problems. Overall, it gives good visibility and control over the entire IT environment. > > **Cons**: The interface could definitely be better. It feels a bit outdated and not very intuitive, especially for someone new to the tool. Some configurations, like setting up alerts or policies, take time to understand. Also, it can get a bit slow when dealing with a large number of devices or when loading detailed data. > > Overall, my experience has been good. It’s a reliable tool that does what it’s supposed to do—monitoring and managing systems effectively. It may not have the most modern look or the easiest learning curve, but once you get used to it, it works well and helps keep things under control. ----- ### "N-Central Product Review" — 4.0/5 > **Parag** | *25 April 2025* | Information Technology & Services | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Pros**: I like the core functionalities of Automation—using filters, rules, custom services, and custom properties is awesome. > > **Cons**: Custom services monitoring sometimes goes stale and times out, and basic troubleshooting does not help. > > I have used other RMM tools like CW Automate Ninja and Datto RMM but N-central has always been my favorite. Overall, I enjoy breaking and making things through N-central. ----- ### "Best Partner, Product is improving quickly." — 5.0/5 > **Joshua** | *6 June 2025* | Computer & Network Security | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Pros**: It's ability to handle 3rd party patches is significant for being a default feature set. They also have built a great first pane of glass experience. > > **Cons**: N-Central does not have the ability to automate against the system itself. This has required my team to work around some of the constraints instead of building exactly what they need. > > N-Able's partnership is not to be matched. They're a great partner. When they promise a feature they deliver it and they're hard at work building the most scalable traditional RMM product that will exist in the market. ----- ### "Solic performer in the MSP arena; best OOB performance among the competition" — 5.0/5 > **James** | *30 April 2026* | Information Technology & Services | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: over the years, i have used a lot of RMM/RAT applications. i honestly like N-Central the best. i have a wide selection of stats and metrics available at a glance and if need more details, there are plenty of tools available for investigation.. you have scripts, file push, system cmd line access. installs are easy via the probe or manually and the Take Control app always connects and its pretty stable. > > **Cons**: I was surprised by the inadequate reporting features. you would think that if i have all these stats and data that i can see on the page, i should be able to check the columns i need and export to a csv, but no. the canned reports are useless. unless you are willing to access n-central via API, i wouldnt even go to the reports section. its the one part of the product i consider subpar and even useless. > > its been solid. we have never had a massive amount of downtime, but there have been a couple. for the 2 instances were services were affected, n-central did reach out and let us know that they knew and were working on it. they kept us informed and resolved the issue in a timely manner.. which for an MSP is minutes, not hours of god forbid, days. ----- ### "N-Central / N-Able Review" — 3.0/5 > **Christian** | *28 April 2026* | Information Technology & Services | Recommendation rating: 3.0/10 > > **Pros**: The alerting system is highly reliable, ensuring that critical issues are flagged immediately without constant noise. Deployment of the agent is generally straightforward across various environments, which saves a significant amount of time during onboarding. Additionally, the patch management engine does a solid job of keeping third-party software and OS versions up to date, providing a dependable baseline for security and system stability across our managed endpoints. > > **Cons**: 1. General Technical Support The support experience has become increasingly frustrating, often feeling like a hurdle rather than a resource. Response times are inconsistent, and there is a noticeable lack of deep technical expertise during initial contact, leading to prolonged downtimes for critical issues. 2. Adlumin Support Support for the Adlumin integration is particularly poor, often resulting in a "finger-pointing" loop where no one takes responsibility. It is difficult to get a straight answer or a specialist who actually understands the nuances of the integration. 3. Lack of Issue Ownership There is a glaring lack of accountability when it comes to taking ownership of open issues. Tickets frequently sit in limbo or are passed between departments without a primary point of contact ensuring the problem is actually resolved to completion. 4. Difficulty with Escalations The escalation process is opaque and incredibly slow. Even when a ticket is clearly beyond the scope of Tier 1, getting it moved to a senior engineer feels like an uphill battle, causing simple technical roadblocks to turn into multi-day ordeals. 5. Automation Policy Limitations (No PowerShell) The inability to natively use PowerShell within automation policies is a major step backward for modern IT environments. Forcing us to use a restrictive, proprietary builder instead of industry-standard scripting severely limits our ability to automate complex tasks. 6. Search Query Regressions A recent update broke the search functionality so that it no longer auto-updates the query results as you type or change parameters. This small but vital UI regression adds unnecessary clicks and friction to what should be a basic, streamlined workflow. 7. Poor Reporting Features The reporting engine is severely lacking and feels outdated. The formatting is strange and unprofessional, making it difficult to hand these documents directly to clients without extensive manual editing or external tools to make the data digestible. 8. Misplaced AI Focus The aggressive push for AI feels like a distraction from core platform stability. Instead of developing AI to solve "non-issues," the development team needs to prioritize fixing the long-standing bugs and workflow limitations that partners deal with every single day. > > The overall experience with N-able is a study in frustration between a solid, functional core and a deteriorating support and development ecosystem. On a technical level, the platform delivers on its primary promises: the alerting is dependable, and the agent deployment and patch management provide a reliable foundation for basic endpoint maintenance. When the "lights are on," the software does exactly what it needs to do to keep a fleet stable. However, the experience begins to sour as soon as you attempt to scale into advanced automation or require vendor assistance. The restriction against native PowerShell in automation policies is a massive hurdle for any modern, script-heavy MSP workflow, forcing a reliance on clunky, proprietary tools. These technical "paper cuts"—like the regressive search UI and lackluster reporting—are compounded by a support structure that seems to lack accountability and a clear escalation path, especially regarding integrations like Adlumin. Ultimately, using N-able feels like driving a reliable car where the manufacturer has stopped listening to the drivers. While the "engine" (patching and alerts) is strong, the "dashboard" (UI/Reports) is dated, and the "service center" (Support) is unresponsive. The recent pivot toward AI features feels like a missed mark; the platform would be far more valuable if the developers focused on refining existing workflows and fixing long-standing bugs rather than chasing industry buzzwords. It remains a "good enough" tool for basic needs, but it is becoming increasingly difficult to justify for high-level automation and complex support requirements. ----- Page: 1 / 11\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.in/software/13803/n-central?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.in/software/13803/n-central) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## Structured Data