--- description: Get information about HackerRank price, usability & features from verified user experiences. Read reviews from Indian business users & discover similar tools. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: HackerRank Price, Features, Reviews & Ratings - Capterra India --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Pre-employment Testing Software](/directory/30863/pre-employment-testing/software) > [HackerRank](/software/143549/hackerrank) # HackerRank Canonical: https://www.capterra.in/software/143549/hackerrank Page: 1 / 5\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.in/software/143549/hackerrank?page=2) > Industry-leading platform empowers tech recruiters to screen, interview, and hire top technical talent at scale. > > Verdict: Rated **4.5/5** by 93 users. Top-rated for **Likelihood to recommend**. ----- ## Overview ### Who Uses HackerRank? Any company that needs to hire technical talent such as software engineers, AI/ML engineers, data scientists and engineers, web and mobile developers, and more. ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **Overall** | **4.5/5** | 93 Reviews | | Ease of Use | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Customer Support Software | 4.4/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Value for Money | 4.3/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Features | 4.5/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 90% | (9/10 Likelihood to recommend) | ## About the vendor - **Company**: HackerRank - **Founded**: 2012 ## Commercial Context - **Starting Price**: $199.00 - **Pricing model**: Usage Based (Free Trial) - **Target Audience**: 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1,000, 1,001–5,000, 5,001–10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Cloud, SaaS, Web-based, Mac (Desktop), Windows (Desktop) - **Supported Languages**: English - **Available Countries**: Afghanistan, Albania, Algeria, American Samoa, Andorra, Angola, Anguilla, Antigua & Barbuda, Argentina, Armenia, Aruba, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Bahamas, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belarus, Belgium and 208 more ## Features - Applicant Tracking Software - Assessment Management - Automatic Grading - Candidate Comparison - Candidate Management - Collaboration Tools - Customizable Questions - Customizable Tests - Data Import/Export - Interview Management - Interview Scheduling - Online Tests - Performance Metrics - Pre-Employment Testing - Pre-made Test Library - Question Library - Reporting/Analytics - Scoring - Skills Assessment - Template Management - Templates - Test/Quiz Creation - Tests/Assessments ## Integrations (6 total) - Avature - Greenhouse - JazzHR - Jobvite - Lever - Workable ## Support Options - Email/Help Desk - FAQs/Forum - Knowledge Base Software - Phone Support - 24/7 (Live rep) - Chat ## Category - [Pre-employment Testing Software](https://www.capterra.in/directory/30863/pre-employment-testing/software) ## Related Categories - [Pre-employment Testing Software](https://www.capterra.in/directory/30863/pre-employment-testing/software) - [Assessment Software](https://www.capterra.in/directory/31117/assessment/software) - [Applicant Tracking Software](https://www.capterra.in/directory/30060/applicant-tracking/software) - [Recruiting Software](https://www.capterra.in/directory/30602/recruiting/software) ## Alternatives 1. [Zoho Recruit](https://www.capterra.in/software/125768/zoho-recruit) — 4.5/5 (1272 reviews) 2. [micro1](https://www.capterra.in/software/1077474/micro1) — 4.9/5 (850 reviews) 3. [100Hires](https://www.capterra.in/software/206957/100hires) — 4.9/5 (1195 reviews) 4. [ZipRecruiter](https://www.capterra.in/software/130706/ziprecruiter) — 4.2/5 (10949 reviews) 5. [NEOGOV](https://www.capterra.in/software/75288/neogov) — 4.5/5 (850 reviews) ## Reviews ### "A Reliable Hiring Tool with Room to Grow Beyond Coding" — 4.0/5 > **Prishi** | *14 July 2026* | Computer Software | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Pros**: Key highlights include: Candidate activity monitoring – The platform tracks time-on-screen and captures screen size metadata, which helps reviewers assess candidate behavior and flag potential anomalies during assessments. Question library \& defaults – Adding default/pre-built questions is straightforward, making it easy to standardize assessments across roles without starting from scratch each time. Ease of setup – The overall configuration experience is intuitive, reducing the administrative overhead for hiring teams. These features collectively make HackerRank a strong choice for teams looking to run structured, auditable technical interviews at scale. > > **Cons**: While HackerRank excels in many areas, there are a few friction points worth noting: Custom question creation is cumbersome – Adding custom questions is not straightforward and can be time-consuming, especially for teams that need to tailor assessments beyond the default library. The process lacks the simplicity you'd expect given how polished the rest of the platform is. Diagram-based questions are challenging for candidates – When assessments include custom diagrams or drawing-type questions, candidates often struggle with the interface. The drawing tools are not intuitive, which can introduce unnecessary friction during the test and may affect performance for reasons unrelated to the candidate's actual skill. These limitations are worth considering if your hiring process relies heavily on custom or visual problem formats — in such cases, supplementing HackerRank with a dedicated diagramming or whiteboarding tool may be necessary. > > HackerRank is a solid platform for conducting technical assessments, particularly for programming and coding-focused evaluations. The built-in question library, candidate monitoring features, and ease of standardizing assessments make it a reliable choice for most engineering hiring workflows. That said, the platform has room to grow in certain areas: Architectural \& system design questions – HackerRank is not yet optimized for architecture-style assessments. The tooling for whiteboarding, diagramming, and evaluating system design thinking feels underdeveloped compared to its strong coding evaluation capabilities. ----- ### "Hackerrank review" — 5.0/5 > **Rajul** | *18 June 2026* | Computer Networking | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: \* Scalable technical assessments that allow evaluation of large candidate pools efficiently. \* Objective and standardized evaluation, helping reduce bias in the screening process. \* Wide library of role-based questions across coding, SQL, AI/ML, security, and other technical domain > > **Cons**: Extremely hard DSA \* Competitive programming questions \* Questions that feel unrelated to the actual role > > Overall, our experience with HackerRank has been positive. The platform has enabled us to efficiently assess technical talent at scale through standardized and objective evaluations. Its extensive question library, assessment customization options, and integrity features have helped improve the quality of candidate screening while reducing manual effort ----- ### "A Solid Platform for Interview-Ready Coding Practice" — 5.0/5 > **Mridul** | *17 February 2026* | Computer Software | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: I liked HackerRank most for its realistic, well-structured problem sets and timed challenges that mirror real interview scenarios. The platform’s test cases and constraints push you to write efficient, production-quality code, not just “passable” solutions. > > **Cons**: The in-browser editor and environment can feel limiting compared to a local setup with proper tooling, tests, and debugging. It’s great for standardization, but not always how I’d work in production. > > Overall, my experience with HackerRank was very positive. The platform offers a wide range of well-structured problems and realistic coding challenges that helped me sharpen my problem-solving skills and write more efficient, edge-case-aware code. The instant feedback and test cases made it easy to iterate and improve quickly. While some problems felt more algorithmic than practical, the overall experience was effective preparation for technical interviews and a good way to stay sharp. ----- ### "Easy to use test with mist accurate results\!" — 5.0/5 > **Piyali** | *10 November 2025* | Information Technology & Services | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Pros**: Highly customizable, accurate results, AI-based plagiarism tracking, and reliable insights for fair, data-driven hiring. > > **Cons**: 1 feature can be added - Where candidates can choose the test / problem which they have to do rather than automated shuffling. > > Its very very easy and any layman can use Hackerrank. Has become my go to tool to assess the technical knowledge ----- ### "A Powerful Platform for Technical Hiring" — 5.0/5 > **Breejesh** | *5 March 2026* | Security & Investigations | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Pros**: What I liked most about HackerRank is its comprehensive coding environment and large library of programming challenges that help developers practice and improve their skills. The platform makes it easy to create and customize coding tests for different roles, which is very useful for technical hiring. The live coding interview feature is also smooth and interactive, allowing candidates and interviewers to collaborate in real time. Overall, it provides a structured and practical way to evaluate programming ability across multiple technologies. > > **Cons**: One drawback of HackerRank is that the pricing for advanced recruiting features can be relatively high for small teams or startups. There could also be more flexibility in the bundles of test takers allowed, which would make the platform more accessible for organizations with varying hiring needs. Additionally, customer support response times could be improved in some cases to provide quicker assistance when issues arise. > > Overall, my experience with HackerRank has been positive. It is a powerful platform for coding practice, technical assessments, and developer skill evaluation. The platform’s problem library and live coding interview tools make it valuable for both learners and organizations conducting technical hiring. While the interface and pricing could be improved, it remains one of the most reliable platforms for coding challenges and developer assessments. ----- Page: 1 / 5\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.in/software/143549/hackerrank?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.in/software/143549/hackerrank) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Structured Data