--- description: Get information about HackerRank price, usability & features from verified user experiences. Read reviews from Indian business users & discover similar tools. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: HackerRank Price, Features, Reviews & Ratings - Capterra India --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Pre-employment Testing Software](/directory/30863/pre-employment-testing/software) > [HackerRank](/software/143549/hackerrank) # HackerRank Canonical: https://www.capterra.in/software/143549/hackerrank Page: 1 / 5\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.in/software/143549/hackerrank?page=2) > Industry-leading platform empowers tech recruiters to screen, interview, and hire top technical talent at scale. > > Verdict: Rated **4.6/5** by 89 users. Top-rated for **Likelihood to recommend**. ----- ## Overview ### Who Uses HackerRank? Any company that needs to hire technical talent such as software engineers, AI/ML engineers, data scientists and engineers, web and mobile developers, and more. ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **Overall** | **4.6/5** | 89 Reviews | | Ease of Use | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Customer Support Software | 4.4/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Value for Money | 4.3/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Features | 4.5/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 90% | (9/10 Likelihood to recommend) | ## About the vendor - **Company**: HackerRank - **Founded**: 2012 ## Commercial Context - **Starting Price**: $199.00 - **Pricing model**: Usage Based (Free Trial) - **Target Audience**: 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1,000, 1,001–5,000, 5,001–10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Cloud, SaaS, Web-based, Mac (Desktop), Windows (Desktop) - **Supported Languages**: English - **Available Countries**: Afghanistan, Albania, Algeria, American Samoa, Andorra, Angola, Anguilla, Antigua & Barbuda, Argentina, Armenia, Aruba, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Bahamas, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belarus, Belgium and 208 more ## Features - Applicant Tracking Software - Assessment Management - Automatic Grading - Candidate Comparison - Candidate Management - Collaboration Tools - Customizable Questions - Customizable Tests - Data Import/Export - Interview Management - Interview Scheduling - Online Tests - Performance Metrics - Pre-Employment Testing - Pre-made Test Library - Question Library - Reporting/Analytics - Scoring - Skills Assessment - Template Management - Templates - Test/Quiz Creation - Tests/Assessments ## Integrations (6 total) - Avature - Greenhouse - JazzHR - Jobvite - Lever - Workable ## Support Options - Email/Help Desk - FAQs/Forum - Knowledge Base Software - Phone Support - 24/7 (Live rep) - Chat ## Category - [Pre-employment Testing Software](https://www.capterra.in/directory/30863/pre-employment-testing/software) ## Related Categories - [Pre-employment Testing Software](https://www.capterra.in/directory/30863/pre-employment-testing/software) - [Assessment Software](https://www.capterra.in/directory/31117/assessment/software) - [Applicant Tracking Software](https://www.capterra.in/directory/30060/applicant-tracking/software) - [Recruiting Software](https://www.capterra.in/directory/30602/recruiting/software) ## Alternatives 1. [Zoho Recruit](https://www.capterra.in/software/125768/zoho-recruit) — 4.5/5 (1253 reviews) 2. [100Hires](https://www.capterra.in/software/206957/100hires) — 4.9/5 (1163 reviews) 3. [micro1](https://www.capterra.in/software/1077474/micro1) — 4.9/5 (626 reviews) 4. [ZipRecruiter](https://www.capterra.in/software/130706/ziprecruiter) — 4.2/5 (10939 reviews) 5. [NEOGOV](https://www.capterra.in/software/75288/neogov) — 4.5/5 (850 reviews) ## Reviews ### "A Powerful Platform for Technical Hiring" — 5.0/5 > **Breejesh** | *5 March 2026* | Security & Investigations | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Pros**: What I liked most about HackerRank is its comprehensive coding environment and large library of programming challenges that help developers practice and improve their skills. The platform makes it easy to create and customize coding tests for different roles, which is very useful for technical hiring. The live coding interview feature is also smooth and interactive, allowing candidates and interviewers to collaborate in real time. Overall, it provides a structured and practical way to evaluate programming ability across multiple technologies. > > **Cons**: One drawback of HackerRank is that the pricing for advanced recruiting features can be relatively high for small teams or startups. There could also be more flexibility in the bundles of test takers allowed, which would make the platform more accessible for organizations with varying hiring needs. Additionally, customer support response times could be improved in some cases to provide quicker assistance when issues arise. > > Overall, my experience with HackerRank has been positive. It is a powerful platform for coding practice, technical assessments, and developer skill evaluation. The platform’s problem library and live coding interview tools make it valuable for both learners and organizations conducting technical hiring. While the interface and pricing could be improved, it remains one of the most reliable platforms for coding challenges and developer assessments. ----- ### "Hackerrank review" — 5.0/5 > **Rajul** | *18 June 2026* | Computer Networking | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: \* Scalable technical assessments that allow evaluation of large candidate pools efficiently. \* Objective and standardized evaluation, helping reduce bias in the screening process. \* Wide library of role-based questions across coding, SQL, AI/ML, security, and other technical domain > > **Cons**: Extremely hard DSA \* Competitive programming questions \* Questions that feel unrelated to the actual role > > Overall, our experience with HackerRank has been positive. The platform has enabled us to efficiently assess technical talent at scale through standardized and objective evaluations. Its extensive question library, assessment customization options, and integrity features have helped improve the quality of candidate screening while reducing manual effort ----- ### "Strong Platform for Technical Hiring" — 3.0/5 > **Sayali** | *7 May 2026* | Airlines/Aviation | Recommendation rating: 7.0/10 > > **Pros**: Real Time Test Monitoring, Flagging code duplicates, Plagarism, Gives good filteration of candidates > > **Cons**: UI is not good, Its lags alot, keeps on parsing, shows red notifications, report download takes time, very slow > > Overall it solves the purpose to get creame candidates for technical development roles, Real Time monitoring candidate's activiy, Flagging the plagarism, Many types of coding questions for all levels, good opportunity for hiring managers to select. ----- ### "Great Platform - Keep Evolving \!\!\!" — 5.0/5 > **Abhinav** | *15 September 2025* | Computer Software | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Pros**: One of the best product for tech screening to aid rapidly growing tech industry. The continuous improvement within the platform where they keep on adding new features to tackle the real workd challenges and making the product sufficient enough to ensure the right quality is being assessed is commendable. The platform is user friendly and easy to navigate and compatible with most of the latest tech stacks. It has many features that enables users to make the best use out of the platform with different operating models that can benefit users witht the cost management as well. We have been using the Hackerrank solution from more than three years and still remains the top choice to filter best talent where the test platform being accessed daily. It is very easy to onboard and integrate and the back office customer support is very good. Your queries are resolved within minutes. Additionally it keeps a regular check on possible internet leaks of the questions, revising the questions timely, AI and proctoring that makes it even more compelling. > > **Cons**: Interview platform is bit less user friendly as sometime it takes a while to admit candidates into the meeting on video call and they do join the chat and it leaves them bit confused as to whether they are actually logged in or not > > Overall experience has been good and the customer support is good too. The customization feature allows users to have their own test which is a good feature. ----- ### "Capterra-HackerRank Feedback Review" — 4.0/5 > **Kishore** | *28 May 2026* | Information Technology & Services | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Pros**: Speed and efficiency in hiring,Large question library,Customizable assessments,Built-in live coding interviews,Objective scoring,Good developer environment,Scales well for campus and bulk hiring. > > **Cons**: Overly wordy or unclear problem statements,Too focused on algorithm puzzles,Timed pressure can feel artificial,Hidden test cases frustration,Occasional platform/editor issues. > > My overall impression of the HackerRank experience is that it’s a strong technical screening platform with clear strengths for scalability and consistency, but it also has noticeable limitations from the candidate perspective. On the positive side: The platform is polished and easy to use technically Coding environments are generally reliable Assessments are fast to deploy Recruiters can evaluate large numbers of candidates efficiently Live coding and automated scoring make remote hiring much easier For companies hiring at scale — especially internships, campus recruiting, and junior engineering roles — it’s easy to see why HackerRank is widely adopted. From the candidate side, though, the experience is more mixed: Some challenges feel overly focused on algorithm tricks Problem wording can be unnecessarily complex Timed assessments create pressure that may not reflect real engineering work Hidden test cases can feel frustrating or opaque A recurring feeling among experienced developers is that success on HackerRank often depends as much on “interview-style coding practice” as on actual software engineering ability. Overall, the platform is generally viewed as: very effective for early-stage filtering, reasonably fair when used carefully, but not sufficient by itself to evaluate engineering talent comprehensively. The most successful hiring processes usually combine HackerRank with: practical interviews, architecture discussions, pair programming, or project-based evaluation. ----- Page: 1 / 5\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.in/software/143549/hackerrank?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.in/software/143549/hackerrank) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Structured Data