--- description: Get information about TestMu AI price, usability & features from verified user experiences. Read reviews from Indian business users & discover similar tools. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: TestMu AI Price, Features, Reviews & Ratings - Capterra India --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Automated Testing Software](/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) > [TestMu AI](/software/170732/lambdatest) # TestMu AI Canonical: https://www.capterra.in/software/170732/lambdatest Page: 1 / 23\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.in/software/170732/lambdatest?page=2) > TestMu AI is a full-stack agentic AI quality engineering platform for planning, executing, and analyzing tests across web, mobile. > > Verdict: Rated **4.6/5** by 545 users. Top-rated for **Likelihood to recommend**. ----- ## Overview ### Who Uses TestMu AI? Computer software, E-learning, Internet, Publishing, Retail, Financial services, Information technology and services, Web design and development, SaaS, Digital Marketing, SIs, PaaS, Fintech,HealthTech ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **Overall** | **4.6/5** | 545 Reviews | | Ease of Use | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Customer Support Software | 4.5/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Value for Money | 4.4/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Features | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 90% | (9/10 Likelihood to recommend) | ## About the vendor - **Company**: LambdaTest - **Location**: San Francisco, US - **Founded**: 2017 ## Commercial Context - **Starting Price**: $15.00 - **Pricing model**: Flat Rate (Free version available) (Free Trial) - **Pricing Details**: Lifetime: Free for 1 parallel test Live: $19/month (billed monthly) or $15/month (billed annually) for 1 parallel test, increasing per parallel test up to $475/month (billed monthly) or $175/month (billed annually) for 25 parallel tests. Real Device: $35/month (billed monthly) or $25/month (billed annually) for 1 parallel test, increasing per parallel test up to $625/month (billed monthly) or $500/month (billed annually) for 25 parallel tests. Large organizations requiring more than 25 parallel tests should contact LambdaTest directly for a custom quote. - **Target Audience**: Self Employed, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1,000, 1,001–5,000, 5,001–10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Cloud, SaaS, Web-based - **Supported Languages**: English - **Available Countries**: Anguilla, Antigua & Barbuda, Aruba, Australia, Austria, Bahamas, Barbados, Belgium, Belize, Bermuda, British Virgin Islands, Bulgaria, Canada, Cayman Islands, Costa Rica, Cuba, Cyprus, Denmark, Dominica, Dominican Republic and 43 more ## Features - Audit Trail - Collaboration Tools - Data Visualization Software - Project Management Software - Requirements Management Software - Software Testing Management - Supports Parallel Execution - Test Script Reviews ## Integrations (15 total) - Asana - Bitbucket - CircleCI - GitHub - GitLab - Hive - Jira - MantisBT - Microsoft Visual Studio - Paymo - Slack - Teamwork.com - Trello - WordPress - monday.com ## Support Options - Email/Help Desk - FAQs/Forum - Knowledge Base Software - Phone Support - 24/7 (Live rep) ## Category - [Automated Testing Software](https://www.capterra.in/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) ## Related Categories - [Automated Testing Software](https://www.capterra.in/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) - [Bug Tracking Software](https://www.capterra.in/directory/30090/bug-tracking/software) - [Performance Testing Software](https://www.capterra.in/directory/31124/performance-testing/software) ## Alternatives 1. [BrowserStack](https://www.capterra.in/software/162900/browserstack) — 4.6/5 (774 reviews) 2. [ACCELQ](https://www.capterra.in/software/161589/accelq) — 4.9/5 (138 reviews) 3. [PFLB](https://www.capterra.in/software/205650/PFLB) — 5.0/5 (44 reviews) 4. [QA Wolf](https://www.capterra.in/software/1012378/qa-wolf) — 5.0/5 (69 reviews) 5. [Centercode](https://www.capterra.in/software/187442/centercode) — 4.2/5 (77 reviews) ## Reviews ### "Good user friendly AI platform for Test Automation and Test Management" — 5.0/5 > **Sriram** | *1 June 2026* | Computer Software | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Pros**: Helps in from the beginning state of test plan until the report generation. A great tool usedful for recording the xpaths and the actions. > > **Cons**: Still this requires manual review and correction in case of complex actions covered in the test cases. > > It helps in reducing manual effort by helping teams create, manage, execute, and track tests. Highly useful in improving the test productivity and fasten the software releases. ----- ### "Excellant FeedBack working on Cloud devices from LambdaTest" — 5.0/5 > **KETAN** | *16 January 2026* | Banking | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: TestMU AI (prior LambdaTest) is an excellent cloud based testing platform which helped us testing out apps over multiple cloud devices. It provides many variations in which a user can select ranging from Android to iOS, with sim without sin devices. Excellant tool > > **Cons**: Basically the sessions recordings were not great and few of the devices were responding slow subject to their data centres reach and availablity > > It has been a good experience working with the lambda test and it provides us a great support in terms of like app testing (UAT OR production apps), so it was a great platform in which we use to upload our apps through Google drive or manually and then it used to test across many cloud platform ranging from Android to iOS and there are good provisions in which you know you can add multiple devices ----- ### "Frustrating Support Experience" — 2.0/5 > **Rohan** | *6 May 2026* | Information Technology & Services | Recommendation rating: 2.0/10 > > **Pros**: The dashboard is pretty straightforward and onboarding new team members hasn't required much internal hand holding. Basic functionality and the UI is not giving us trouble. > > **Cons**: Experience with support was terrible. They took multiple tries to even simply explain their Multi-Device offering to me, and I've had different agents give me different information. Everytime you ask a counter question, they want to get on a call. Why cant you just equip yourself better and resolve queries? I would schedule a call if I had the time, why would I reach out on chat? > > Basic functionality work fine, so getting by. But every interaction with support is a nightmare. They also recently removed their base tier Real Device Plan. We wanted to expand our parallels, but our hard luck. By the time we got to procuring, it had already disappeared and now the base price is higher ----- ### "Very Helpful for iOS and Flutter App Testing" — 5.0/5 > **Saumil** | *7 January 2026* | Information Technology & Services | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Pros**: What I like most about LambdaTest is the easy access to real devices and different iOS versions in one platform. It helps me test iOS and Flutter apps without managing physical devices. The interface is simple and testing setup is quick. It saves a lot of time in daily development and release cycles. > > **Cons**: Sometimes there is a waiting time for popular real devices during peak hours. Also, a few devices can feel a bit slow when the network is not stable. However, overall performance and usability are still good for regular testing work. > > Overall, my experience with LambdaTest has been very good and smooth. It is reliable for testing iOS and Flutter apps on multiple devices and OS versions. The platform is easy to use and saves a lot of testing time. It helps in delivering better quality apps with fewer issues. ----- ### "Reliable Cross-Browser Testing Platform Worth Considering" — 5.0/5 > **Daya** | *6 October 2025* | E-Learning | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Pros**: Easy to learn with minimal setup time. Automation features and test management are straightforward, and the real device cloud helps catch browser-specific bugs we'd otherwise miss. > > **Cons**: Honestly, it's working perfectly for me so far. Haven't faced any major issues yet - all features are working fine and meeting my testing needs. > > LambdaTest handles cross-browser testing well with decent security and reliable automation. The learning curve is gentle, but occasional speed issues and pricing concerns keep it from being perfect. Still a solid choice for teams needing comprehensive browser coverage. ----- Page: 1 / 23\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.in/software/170732/lambdatest?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.in/software/170732/lambdatest) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Structured Data